Key Takeaways from Delegate Programs
StableLab has not only evaluated these initiatives but has been an active participant in shaping governance across multiple DAOs. Through direct involvement in designing and implementing delegate programs, StableLab has observed firsthand what drives sustainable and effective governance.
These insights come from real-world experience, not theoretical speculation:
DAOs need structured incentives to sustain governance – Without performance-based compensation, governance stagnates. Programs in Compound, Arbitrum, and Uniswap have demonstrated how structured incentives drive meaningful engagement.
Delegate performance must be measured – Compensation should be tied to clear KPIs like voting participation (80%+), governance discussion engagement, and proposal authorship.
Governance should evolve as DAOs scale – A governance structure that works at 1,000 members won’t work at 100,000. DAOs must refine their governance models as they grow.
Delegation isn’t one-size-fits-all – Some DAOs benefit from tiered performance incentives (Arbitrum), while others thrive with retroactive rewards (Optimism). Selecting the right compensation model is key.
Failure to iterate governance is a major risk – Static delegation models, excessive bureaucracy, and unchecked power concentration are governance risks. DAOs should regularly reassess and refine governance frameworks.
Summary
1inch DAO
$4,000/month
500K 1INCH tokens delegated, 3+ months of active governance contributions
Strict eligibility criteria ensure professional governance participation.
Uniswap
$9,400/month
Top 11 delegates based on voting engagement & activity
Shift from passive delegation to proactive governance with incentive-driven model.
Push DAO
10,000 PUSH (shared)
85% voting participation & rationales required
High accountability & council oversight create strong governance discipline.
Optimism
6,000 OP/month
70% participation, contributions to RPGF
Retroactive funding & liquid democracy drive long-term engagement.
MakerDAO
$48k/year
Top 6 delegates only, tied to MKR delegation & performance
Gold standard for linking reputation, compliance, and governance effectiveness.
Lido DAO
Up to $5,000/month
70% participation, voting rationales, minimum 2M LDO delegated
Participation quotas ensure active engagement & professional conduct.
Gnosis DAO
5,000 GNO delegation per delegate (not direct financial rewards)
70% voting participation, full publication of rationales
Non-financial incentives (governance power) protect treasury while maintaining engagement.
Arbitrum
Up to $7,000/month
25% participation, 50K ARB delegated
Tiered rewards balance inclusivity & high-performance governance.
Aave DAO (Aave Orbit)
$5,000/month in GHO + gas refunds
70% participation, 20K token delegation
Clear role separation between service providers & delegates prevents conflicts of interest.
Rari DAO
None
Open delegation, biannual events
Regular redelegation events keep governance dynamic without financial burden.
Paraswap DAO
None (pilot phase)
80% voting participation, 100% rationale submission
Testing engagement strategies before introducing financial incentives.
Polygon DAO
60K POL/quarterly
Performance-based rewards tied to governance outcomes
Combining technical expertise with participation incentives ensures governance alignment.
Last updated